top of page

A New Chapter for Turkish Manufacturing: What the EU's 'Made in Europe' Push Means for Your Supply Chain

Mar 5
4 min read

Updated: May 8

Aerial photograph of an Istanbul textile factory district at dusk.


Something significant is unfolding in Brussels — and it has direct consequences for every brand sourcing garments from outside the EU. The European Commission's newly unveiled Industrial Accelerator Act is reshaping how European buyers think about where and from whom they source. For Turkish manufacturers, this is a moment that demands attention.

What Is the Industrial Accelerator Act?

Released on March 4, 2026, the EU's Industrial Accelerator Act is the European Commission's most ambitious move yet to bring manufacturing back inside European borders, or at least within closely aligned trade partners. The Act introduces a "Made in Europe" preference in public procurement across strategic sectors, and it sets minimum local-content requirements for green technologies including batteries, electric vehicles, solar, and wind components.

In its current draft form, the legislation defines "Made in Europe" to include EU member states and EEA countries (Iceland, Norway, Liechtenstein), but notably excludes Turkey. This is the clause that has sent alarm bells through Ankara and through factories from Istanbul to Bursa.

Turkey's Position: Deep Integration, Uncertain Status

Turkey and the EU have operated under a Customs Union since 1995, one of the most far-reaching trade integrations between the EU and a non-member country. Turkish manufacturers have spent decades building supply chain infrastructure that feeds directly into European production. In automotive alone, Turkey exported $30 billion to the EU in 2025, accounting for 72.5% of total automotive exports.

In textiles and apparel, Turkey ranks as the 2nd largest supplier to the EU. The entire nearshoring conversation that European fashion brands have been having since the disruptions of 2020–2022 has largely pointed toward Turkey as the answer: fast lead times, strong fabric infrastructure, ethical production credentials, and geographic proximity.

Industry voices in Turkey are clear. As the head of the Turkish Automotive Manufacturers Association put it, this cannot be treated simply as a "Made in EU" policy, it is a "Made in Europe" approach, and Turkey, as one of Europe's most embedded manufacturing partners, should not be left out. If Turkish producers are excluded, the entire meaning of the Customs Union becomes questionable.

What This Means for Garment and Textile Sourcing

The current Act focuses primarily on heavy industry, automotives, batteries, and green tech, not fashion. In fact, the European Commission's rollout conspicuously omitted any mention of the textile sector. This is not an oversight; it reflects a calculated decision to prioritize industrial decarbonization over apparel.

But the broader regulatory environment is tightening, and garment manufacturers ignoring this trend do so at their own risk. EU textile regulations already in motion, including the Digital Product Passport, CSRD reporting requirements, and the ESPR framework, are pushing brands to demand full supply chain traceability and verified sustainability credentials from their suppliers. These requirements apply to any supplier selling into the EU market, regardless of origin.

The message for Turkish manufacturers is this: proximity is an advantage, but compliance is the new baseline. Brands that once chose Turkey purely on cost are now choosing Turkey, or choosing not to, based on traceability, certifications, and documentation. The question is whether your factory is positioned to meet that standard.

The Real Competitive Landscape

The honest picture: Turkey's position in European garment sourcing is not automatically secure. China still accounts for over a fifth of Europe's apparel imports. Bangladesh continues to grow its EU market share. Egypt is emerging as a serious competitor offering nearshoring proximity at a fraction of Turkish labor costs, and over 200 Turkish textile factories already operate there.

Meanwhile, the EU recently signed a trade agreement with India granting Indian textile exports zero-duty access to European markets. The window of competitive advantage that Turkey has held is narrowing.

What cannot be replicated in Egypt, Bangladesh, or India is Turkey's combination of: 40+ years of export-grade quality infrastructure, full vertical integration from yarn to finished garment, established logistics corridors to Europe, and a deep pool of technical expertise. These are structural advantages but they need to be paired with the right certifications, the right documentation, and the right communication to European buyers.

Our Position at Istanbul Tekstil

At Istanbul Tekstil, we have been manufacturing circular-knit garments for US, UK, and European brands for over four decades. We did not build this business on cheap labor. We built it on precision, reliability, and the ability to work with brands that demand quality at scale, 600,000+ pieces per month with the flexibility that far-east factories simply cannot offer.

The regulatory shift underway in Brussels is, in many ways, a tailwind for Turkish manufacturers who are already operating at the premium end of the market. If you are sourcing knitwear for a brand that cares about transparency, lead times, sustainability credentials, and the ability to communicate directly with your manufacturer, this is the right moment to talk.

The legislation has not been finalized. Turkey's inclusion in the "Made in Europe" framework remains an open lobbying battle, and one that the Turkish manufacturing sector is fighting hard. Whatever the outcome, the fundamental case for Istanbul as a manufacturing base for European brands remains strong. We intend to keep it that way.

What Should Brands Do Now?

If you are a brand sourcing or considering sourcing from Turkey, the practical steps are straightforward. First, map your supply chain documentation now, the Digital Product Passport and CSRD requirements are not optional for EU-market brands. Second, evaluate your current factory partners against the incoming EU traceability standards. Third, do not wait for the legislation to be finalized before having these conversations; the brands that move early will have the strongest position.

We are watching this space closely and will continue to update our clients and partners as the Industrial Accelerator Act moves through the European Parliament. If you have questions about what this means for your sourcing strategy, get in touch. It is what we are here for.

 
 
 

Related Posts

See All
7 Red Flags When Choosing a Garment Manufacturer

I have been manufacturing circular knit garments in Istanbul since 1985. In that time, I have seen brands burn through manufacturers like tissue paper — not because good factories do not exist, but be

 
 
 

Comments

Rated 0 out of 5 stars.
No ratings yet

Add a rating
bottom of page